Spinal Anesthesia for Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Comparative Rates of Transient Neurological Symptoms and Urinary Retention Using Lidocaine, Mepivacaine, and Bupivacaine.

BACKGROUND: Short-acting spinal anesthetics enable rapid recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty; however, concerns with transient neurological symptoms (TNS) cause some to avoid using lidocaine. Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is also a concern with spinal anesthesia. We sought to study the comparative rates of TNS and POUR between lidocaine, mepivacaine, and bupivacaine in a high-volume hip and knee arthroplasty setting. METHODS: Data for 1,217 primary THA, TKA, and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty cases were reviewed and grouped by spinal anesthetic agent (lidocaine, mepivacaine, or bupivacaine). Of the 1,217 cases, utilization was 523 lidocaine, 573 mepivacaine, and 121 bupivacaine. The incidence of TNS and POUR requiring catheterization was measured both by clinical evaluation as well as a questionnaire sent to patients 14 days postoperatively. RESULTS: The overall rate of TNS was 8%. With the numbers available, there was no difference in rates of TNS between groups (6.9% lidocaine, 9.2% mepivacaine, and 4.1% bupivacaine; P = .297). There was no difference in rates of TNS or POUR between THA and TKA/unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bupivacaine had a significantly higher rate of urinary retention (9.1%; P < .001) than mepivacaine (2.8%) or lidocaine (1.5%). CONCLUSION: This study showed no difference in the rate of TNS between the 3 common agents used in spinal anesthesia. Short-acting spinal anesthetics such as lidocaine and mepivacaine can lower the rate of POUR requiring catheterization, helping to enable rapid recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty.

Patient Comfort, Safety, and Effectiveness of Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers Formulated With Different Local Anesthetics.

BACKGROUND: Maximizing patient comfort during hyaluronic acid gel injection is a common concern that is usually addressed by selecting fillers with lidocaine. OBJECTIVE: Two randomized, double-blinded, split-face trials aimed to demonstrate noninferiority of specific hyaluronic acid fillers incorporating mepivacaine (RHA-M) versus their lidocaine controls, at providing pain relief. METHODS: Thirty subjects per trial received injections of RHA R -M versus RHA R , and RHA4-M versus RHA4, respectively, in the perioral rhytids (PR) and nasolabial folds (NLF). Pain was assessed on a visual analog scale; aesthetic effectiveness was evaluated with validated scales, and safety was monitored based on common treatment responses (CTRs) and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: RHA-M fillers proved as effective as their lidocaine counterparts at reducing pain (noninferior, p < .0002 and p < .0001). Bilateral wrinkle improvement was measured both in the PR (-1.5 ± 0.6 points on each side) and in the NLF (-1.8 ± 0.6 and -1.9 ± 0.5 points) trials at one month, with virtually identical responder rates (≥96.7%). Common treatment responses and AEs were similar between treated sides, and none was clinically significant. CONCLUSION: Resilient hyaluronic acid fillers with either mepivacaine or lidocaine are equally effective at reducing pain during treatment and equally performant and safe for correction of dynamic facial wrinkles and folds.

[Local anesthetics with elderly patients]. / Die Anwendung von Lokalanästhetika bei Patientinnen und Patienten im Alter.

When choosing local anesthetics, risk factors such as underlying diseases, use of other medications and allergies have to be taken into consideration. Systematic complications might occur if a specific limit in the plasma concentration is exceeded. Articaine and prilocaine are metabolized extrahepatically. In case of an absolute contraindication for vasoconstrictors, the use of mepivacaine, bupivacaine or articaine is recommended.

Implantation of a peritoneal dialysis catheter in patients with ESRD using local anesthesia and Remifentanil.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study is to test the feasibility of the local anesthetic (LA) Mepivacaine 1% and sedation with Remifentanil as the primary anesthetic technique for the insertion of a peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter, without the need to convert to general anesthesia. METHODS: We analyzed 27 consecutive end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who underwent the placement of a peritoneal catheter at our center between March 2015 and January 2019. The procedures were all performed by a general or vascular surgeon, and the postoperative care and follow-up were all conducted by the same peritoneal dialysis team. RESULTS: All of the 27 subjects successfully underwent the procedure without the need of conversion to general anesthesia. The catheter was deemed prone to usage in all patients and was found to be leak-proof in 100% of the patients. CONCLUSION: This study describes a safe and successful approach for insertion of a PD catheter by combined infiltration of the local anesthetic Mepivacaine 1% and sedation with Remifentanil. Hereby, ESRD patients can be treated without general anesthesia, while ensuring functionality of the PD catheter.

Immediate local anesthetic reactions and diagnostic test results in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Adverse reactions to local anesthetics are relatively common, but proven IgE-mediated allergy is extremely rare. We aimed to determine the frequency of local anesthetic allergy in pediatric patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of 73 patients who presented to our clinic with a history of suspected allergic reaction to local anesthetics and underwent diagnostic testing between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Diagnoses were based on case histories, skin tests, and subcutaneous challenge tests. RESULTS: A total of 75 test series were carried out on the 73 patients (43 boys; median [IQR] age 9.25 [7.26-14.25] years, range 3-17.8 years). The most commonly tested drugs were lidocaine (n = 38; 50.6%) and prilocaine (n = 15; 20%). Local anesthetic allergy was confirmed in one (1.3%) of the 73 patients by positive subcutaneous challenge test with mepivacaine. CONCLUSION: There are limited data in the current literature regarding local anesthetic allergies and diagnosis test results in pediatric patients. Proven local anesthetic allergy is less common than expected by society and physicians, and therefore diagnostic tests are needed for patients with no contra-indications such as severe or life-threatening reactions.

Complications following equine sacroiliac region analgesia are uncommon: A study in 118 horses.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of sacroiliac region pain is supported by a positive response to sacroiliac region analgesia (SIRA). Varying techniques have been described for SIRA; with clinician preference often dictating method. Potential complications following SIRA include ataxia and recumbency. No study has specifically evaluated the prevalence of complications. OBJECTIVES: To describe the complication prevalence following SIRA in a referral clinic. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Review of records from horses presented to two of the authors at Rossdales, Newmarket, between January 2014 and December 2018, that underwent SIRA. Injection was performed using a blind midline approach with 20 mL mepivacaine (Intra-Epicaine 20mg/ml; Dechra) infiltrated through a straight 18 gauge 8.9cm spinal needle subdivided into four sub-locations per block. RESULTS: 118 horses were included, with 167 individual blocks. One horse showed a mild hindlimb gait abnormality following SIRA, which resolved uneventfully over 3 hours; complication rate 1/118 horses (0.85%; 95% CI: 0,2.5%), 1/167 joints (0.60%; 95% CI: 0,1.8%). SIRA subjectively improved lameness/performance in 132/167 (79%) joints. 49/118 (42%) received bilateral SIRA with 53/118 (45%) evaluated ridden following SIRA. MAIN LIMITATIONS: Small population numbers with low complication prevalence rate. CONCLUSIONS: SIRA, using the described technique, has a low (0.85%) prevalence of complications.

Influence of clinical and experimental intra-articular inflammation on neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin concentrations in horses.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) concentrations in serum and synovial fluid (SF) from horses with joint inflammation. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental studies and retrospective clinical study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Serum and SF samples were available from healthy horses (n = 19), clinical cases, and horses with experimental joint inflammation. Clinical cases included horses with (n = 10) or without (n = 10) septic arthritis. Experimental intra-articular inflammation was induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS; n = 7, severe inflammation), lidocaine (n = 6, moderate inflammation), or mepivacaine (n = 6, mild inflammation). METHODS: Availability of samples was based on approval from the local ethical committee and from the Danish Animal Experiments Inspectorate. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin was measured with a previously validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Repeated-measurements one- and two-way analysis of variance and correlation analysis were used to analyze NGAL concentrations and white blood cell counts (WBC). RESULTS: After injection of LPS or lidocaine, SF NGAL concentrations increased 343- (P = .0035) and 60-fold (P = .0038) relative to baseline, respectively. Serum NGAL also increased in both groups (P < .05) but to lower concentrations than in SF. Concentrations were higher after injection of lidocaine SF NGAL than after injection of mepivacaine (P < .05) at 6 and 12 hours. Synovial fluid concentrations of NGAL were higher in horses with septic arthritis than in the nonseptic group (P = .0070) and in healthy controls (P = .0071). Concentrations of NGAL correlated with WBC in SF (P < .0001, R2 = 0.49) and in blood (P = .0051, R2 = 0.27). CONCLUSION: Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin concentrations increased in SF in response to experimentally induced and naturally occurring joint inflammation. Synovial fluid NGAL concentration correlated with WBC and, thus, seems to reflect intensity of joint inflammation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin may prove to be a useful biomarker of joint inflammation and infection in horses.

Tolerability of IM penicillin G benzathine diluted or not with local anesthetics, or different gauge needles for syphilis treatment: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Penicillin G Benzathine (PGB) is the cornerstone of syphilis treatment. However, its intramuscular (IM) administration is associated with pain at the site of injection. The dilution of PGB with local anesthetics is recommended in some guidelines, but the evidence that supports it, particularly in adults and in HIV infection, is scarce. Preliminary clinical experience also suggests that the IM administration of PGB through increased needle gauges might improve its tolerability. The aim of the study to identify less painful ways of administering IM PGB in the treatment of syphilis in adults. METHODS: Multicenter, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial in patients diagnosed with primary syphilis that required a single IM injection of PGB 2400,00 IU. Patients were randomized to receive PGB diluted with 0.5 mL mepivacaine 1% (MV) or PGB alone, and both groups either with a long 19G or short 21G IM needle. The primary objective was the effect on local pain immediately after the administration through a visual scale questionnaire on pain (0 to 10). RESULTS: One hundred eight patients were included, 27 in each group. Ninety-four (94.4%) were male, and 41.7% were also HIV-infected. Mean age 36.6 years (SD 11). Significant differences in immediate pain intensity were observed when comparing the long 19G group with anesthesia (mean pain intensity, [MPI] 2.92 [CI 95% 1.08-4.07]) vs long 19G without anesthesia (MPI 5.56 [CI 95% 4.39-6.73), p < 0.001; and also between short 21G group with anesthesia (MPI 3.36 [CI 95% 2.22-4.50]) vs short 21G without anesthesia (MPI 5.06 [CI 95% 3.93-6.19]), p = 0.015). No significant differences in immediate pain were observed between 19G and 21G in the presence or absence of anesthesia (p = 1.0 in both cases). No differences were found between study arms after 6 and 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: The IM administration of 1% mepivacaine-diluted PGB induces significantly less immediate local pain as compared to PGB alone. The needle gauge did not have any effect on the pain. Based on these results, we suggest anesthetic-diluted IM PGB as the standard treatment for primary syphilis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2014-003969-24 (Date of registration 18/09/2014).

Ipsilateral transient amaurosis, mydriasis and light reflex absence after subconjunctival local anesthesia with mepivacaine in three patients with refractory glaucoma - a case report.

BACKGROUND: The subconjunctival anesthesia with local anesthetics is considered as a low-risk procedure allowing ocular surgery without serious complications typical for retro- or parabulbar anesthesia, especially in patients with preexisting Optic Nerve damage. We report development of ipsilateral transient amaurosis accompanied with mydriasis and both, direct and consensual light response absence. CASE PRESENTATION: Three patients with advanced refractory glaucoma undergoing laser cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) for intraocular pressure lowering experienced these adverse effects just few minutes after subconjunctival injection of mepivacaine 2% solution (Scandicaine® 2%, without vasoconstrictor supplementation). The vision was completely recovered to usual values in up to 20 h after mepivacaine application. Extensive ophthalmological examination, including cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), revealed no further ocular abnormalities, especially no vascular constriction or thrombotic signs as well as no retinal detachment. The oculomotor function remained intact. The blockade of ipsilateral ciliary ganglion parasympathetic fibers by mepivacaine may be the responsible mechanism. Systemic pathways as drug-drug interactions seem to be unlikely involved. Importantly, all three patients tolerated the same procedure previously or at a later date without any complication. Overall, our thoroughly elaborated risk management could not determine the causative factor explaining the observed ocular complications just in the current occasion and not at other time points. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors should be aware and patients should be informed about such rare complications after subconjunctival local anesthetics administration. Adequate risk management should insure patients' safety.

Lidocaine as a Rare and Hidden Allergen in the Perioperative Setting: A Case Report.

Local anesthetics are used throughout the health care system. In the perioperative setting and in other settings of exposure to local anesthetics, true allergy is reported very rarely. We present an unusual case of immediate-type perioperative hypersensitivity to lidocaine with cross-reaction to mepivacaine, which was missed on initial investigation. This case illustrates that lidocaine may be a "hidden allergen" in the perioperative setting and should always be considered a potential culprit in cases of suspected perioperative hypersensitivity. The case also demonstrates that suspected perioperative hypersensitivity requires highly specialized investigation and close collaboration between allergists and anesthesiologists.

Addition of Infiltration Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee and Adductor Canal Block to Periarticular Injection Enhances Postoperative Pain Control in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Periarticular injections (PAIs) are becoming a staple component of multimodal joint pathways. Motor-sparing peripheral nerve blocks, such as the infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) and the adductor canal block (ACB), may augment PAI in multimodal analgesic pathways for knee arthroplasty, but supporting literature remains rare. We hypothesized that the addition of ACB and IPACK to PAI would lower pain on ambulation on postoperative day (POD) 1 compared to PAI alone. METHODS: This triple-blinded randomized controlled trial included 86 patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Patients either received (1) a PAI (control group, n = 43) or (2) an IPACK with an ACB and modified PAI (intervention group, n = 43). The primary outcome was pain on ambulation on POD 1. Secondary outcomes included numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores, patient satisfaction, and opioid consumption. RESULTS: The intervention group reported significantly lower NRS pain scores on ambulation than the control group on POD 1 (difference in means [95% confidence interval], -3.3 [-4.0 to -2.7]; P < .001). In addition, NRS pain scores on ambulation on POD 0 (-3.5 [-4.3 to -2.7]; P < .001) and POD 2 (-1.0 [-1.9 to -0.1]; P = .033) were significantly lower. Patients in the intervention group were more satisfied, had less opioid consumption (P = .005, postanesthesia care unit, P = .028, POD 0), less intravenous opioids (P < .001), and reduced need for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (P = .037). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of IPACK and ACB to PAI significantly improves analgesia and reduces opioid consumption after total knee arthroplasty compared to PAI alone. This study strongly supports IPACK and ACB use within a multimodal analgesic pathway.

Avaliação comparativa de articaína 4% versus mepivacaína 2% para cirurgia de terceiros molares: ensaio clínico controlado, randomizado, duplo-cego, de boca dividida / Comparative evaluation of articaine 4% versus mepivacaine 2% for third molar surgery: randomized controlled trial, double-blind, mouth divided

A eficácia do controle da dor em exodontias de terceiros molares está associada ao tipo e concentração do anestésico local. No entanto a taxa de sucesso pode variar de acordo com o anestésico usado, influenciando no controle da dor, nos índices de complicações, entre elas a parestesia, e alterações sistêmicas do paciente. Este estudo clínico controlado em boca dividida, comparou o uso dos anestésicos locais cloridrato de articaína 4% e do cloridrato de mepivacaína 2%, ambos com epinefrina 1:100.000, para a anestesia local em exodontias de terceiros molares inferiores. Vinte pacientes, de ambos os gêneros, com idade média de 21 anos, com terceiros molares inferiores bilaterais em posições semelhantes de acordo com as classificações de Winter e Pell & Gregory, foram submetidos às cirurgias para exodontias, em consultas separadas, com cada um dos lados (direito e esquerdo) randomizados e alocados em dois grupos diferentes, denominados: Grupo 1ART (articaína 4%) e Grupo 2MEP (mepivacaína 2%). Os parâmetros de comparação foram: índice de dor, medida por meio de Escala Visual Analógica (EVA) no trans e pós-operatório imediato; também análise da eficácia anestésica, parâmetros hemodinâmicos, complicações durante e após a cirurgia, dentre os quais se enquadram a ocorrência de parestesia pós-operatória, e a satisfação do paciente e do operador. Não foram encontradas diferenças significativas nos índices de dor na comparação entre os dois anestésicos. O controle da dor foi mais efetivo até 2 horas do pós-operatório imediato e um menor volume de mepivacaína foi necessário para execução do procedimento (p=0,014). A ocorrência de parestesia foi observada com os dois tipos de anestésicos. O uso da articaína e da mepivacaína foi satisfatório para o paciente, e cirurgião, tendo este, o maior grau de satisfação para os momentos de divulsão e sutura (p<0,05), com a articaína(AU)

The efficacy of pain control in third molars is associated with the type and concentration of local anesthetic. However, success rates may vary according to the anesthetic used, influencing pain control, complication rates, including paresthesia and systemic changes of the patient. This split-mouth controlled clinical study compared the use of local anesthetics with 4% articaine hydrochloride and 2% mepivacaine hydrochloride, both with epinephrine 1: 100,000, for local anesthesia in lower molar extractions. Twenty patients of both genders, with an average age of 21 years, with three bilateral inferior inferiors in the limits according to the statistics of Winter and Pell & Gregory, underwent extraction surgeries, in collected consultations, with each one of them. The following sides (right and left) were randomized and allocated into two different groups, namely: Group 1ART (4% articaine) and Group 2MEP (2% mepivacaine). The comparison parameters were: pain index, measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in the trans and immediate postoperative period; also analysis of anesthesia efficacy, hemodynamic parameters, adverse events during and after surgery, which include the occurrence of postoperative paresthesia and patient and operator satisfaction. No significant differences were found in the comparison rates between two anesthetics. Pain control was more effective with in 2 hours of the immediate postoperative period and a smaller volume of mepivacaine was required to perform the procedure (p = 0.014). The occurrence of paresthesia was observed with both types of anesthetics. The use of articaine and mepivacaine was satisfactory for the patient and surgeon, who had a higher degree of satisfaction with the moments of division and suture (p <0.05) with one articaine(AU)

Nonformalin Fixative Agents: A Comparative Study of Fixative Efficacy and Histomorphology.

OBJECTIVES: Formalin is a gold standard fixative agent. However, formalin possesses health hazards and is not always available in rural areas. The objective of this study was to compare tissue fixative efficacy of nonformalin fixative agents with formalin. METHODS: Oral tissues obtained during impacted tooth removal were collected. The tissue fragments were sectioned and fixed in 4 different fixatives; 30% jaggery, 70% ethanol, 2% mepivacaine with 1:100 000 epinephrine, or formalin for 24 and 72 hours. All specimens were then immersed in formalin for another 24 hours and processed according to standard protocol. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections were evaluated by a pathologist. The cellular structure, cellular outline, and quality of staining were graded from 1 to 3 and average fixative efficacy scores were compared using 1-way analysis of variance. Fixative artifacts were described. RESULTS: Fixative efficacy scores of 70% ethanol and 30% jaggery at 24 and 72 hours were not statistically different from those of formalin. Conversely, 2% mepivacaine demonstrated significantly lower fixative efficacy scores than other agents. Although efficacy of each fixative was not statistically different between 24 and 72 hours, efficacy of 70% ethanol was markedly reduced at 72 hours when compared with others. Acantholysis of epithelial cells was the most notable artifact at 72 hours when fixed with nonformalin fixative agents. CONCLUSION: Both 70% ethanol and 30% jaggery provided acceptable fixative efficacy at 24 hours. However, only 30% jaggery maintained fixative efficacy at 72 hours. Nevertheless, negative effects on the epithelial cells were unavoidable and should be interpreted with caution.

Efficiency and predictive parameters of outcome of a multimodal pain management concept with spinal injections in patients with low back pain: a retrospective study of 445 patients.

Low back pain is one of the most common diseases of modern civilization. Multimodal pain management (MPM) represents a central approach to avoiding surgery. Short-term results are published rarely and often incomparable because of different treatment concepts. This study compared the subjective and objective parameters as well as the anamnestic and clinical parameters of 445 patients with low back pain before and after inpatient MPM to investigate the influence of this type of therapy on short-term outcome. The majority of patients were very satisfied (39%) or satisfied (58%) with the treatment outcome. The median pain reduction for back pain was 3.0 (IQR 2.88) (numeric rating scale, NRS), thus 66% and 2.75 (IQR 3.38, 62%) for leg pain. The main pain reduction occurred within the first 10 days of treatment and was clinically significant from day 5 onwards. The outcome for patients with hospitalization of more than 10 days was significantly worse. The parameters female sex, BMI of > 30, local pain, and pain duration of 3-24 months had a significantly better outcome. In contrast, age, treatment cause, depression, anxiety, and other diseases had no statistically significant influence on outcome. MPM therapy for more than 5 days seems to be an efficient short-term approach to treating low back pain. Knowledge of some of the outcome predictors helps to early identify patients who require more intensive individual care. In the case of no clear indication for surgery, MPM can be an appropriate treatment option.

Afectación retiniana tras inyección accidental intravítrea de mepivacaína y epinefrina / Retinal toxicity after accidental intravitreal injection of mepivacaine and adrenaline

Caso clínico: Varón de 32 años sin antecedentes de interés que sufre accidente de tráfico con trauma craneoencefálico leve, con herida inciso-contusa supraciliar izquierda que se extiende al párpado superior izquierdo sin pérdida de visión. Tras la inyección anestésica palpebral se produjo disminución de agudeza visual súbita del ojo izquierdo e hiposfagma localizado entre la I-III a 4 mm del limbo, con aumento de la presión intraocular. En el fondo de ojo se observó una lesión blanquecina con un punto hemorrágico central que se correspondía con el área del hiposfagma. Discusión: La infiltración anestésica durante la reparación palpebral puede complicarse con la penetración inadvertida del globo ocular. La mepivacaína y epinefrina intravítreas pueden causar lesiones maculares y retinianas por sí solas, así como por el aumento súbito de la presión intraocular (AU)

Case report: The case is presented of a 32 year-old male with no medical history of interest who suffered a traffic accident with mild traumatic brain injury. He had a left supraciliary incised and contused wound that extended to the left upper eyelid, with no loss of vision. After palpebral anaesthetic injection, there was a sudden visual acuity decrease in the left eye and hyposphagma located between I-III at 4 mm from the limbus, with increased intraocular pressure. A whitish lesion with a central haemorrhagic focus was observed in the ocular fundus, corresponding to the area where the hyposphagma was located. Discussion: Anaesthetic injection during palpebral repair may be complicated by inadvertent penetration of the eyeball. Intravitreal mepivacaine and adrenaline could cause macular and retinal lesions (AU)

Mepivacaine Spinal Anesthesia Facilitates Rapid Recovery in Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Bupivacaine.

BACKGROUND: Mepivacaine as a spinal anesthetic for rapid recovery in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not been assessed. The purpose of this study is to compare spinal mepivacaine vs bupivacaine for postoperative measures in patients undergoing primary TKA. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected single-institution database was performed on 156 consecutive patients who underwent primary TKA. Fifty-three patients were administered mepivacaine and 103 patients were administered bupivacaine. Primary outcomes were urinary retention, length of stay, pain control, opioid consumption, and distance associated with physical therapy. Statistical analysis with univariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate the effect of anesthetic with primary outcomes. RESULTS: Patients undergoing TKA with mepivacaine had a shorter length of stay (28.1 ± 11.2 vs 33.6 ± 14.4 hours, P = .002) and fewer episodes of straight catheterization (3.8% vs 16.5%, P = .021) compared to bupivacaine. Patients administered mepivacaine exhibited slightly higher VAS pain scores and morphine consumption in the postanesthesia care unit (1.3 ± 1.9 vs 0.5 ± 1.3, P = .002; 2.2 ± 3.3 vs 0.8 ± 2.1 equivalents/h, P = .002), but otherwise exhibited no difference in VAS scores or morphine consumption afterwards. There was no need to convert to general anesthesia or transient neurologic symptom complication in either group. CONCLUSION: Mepivacaine for spinal anesthesia with TKA had adequate duration to complete the surgery and facilitated a more rapid recovery with less urinary complications and a shorter length of stay. Patients administered mepivacaine did not display worse pain control or transient neurologic symptoms afterwards.

Retinal toxicity after accidental intravitreal injection of mepivacaine and adrenaline. / Afectación retiniana tras inyección accidental intravítrea de mepivacaína y epinefrina.

CASE REPORT: The case is presented of a 32 year-old male with no medical history of interest who suffered a traffic accident with mild traumatic brain injury. He had a left supraciliary incised and contused wound that extended to the left upper eyelid, with no loss of vision. After palpebral anaesthetic injection, there was a sudden visual acuity decrease in the left eye and hyposphagma located between I-III at 4mm from the limbus, with increased intraocular pressure. A whitish lesion with a central haemorrhagic focus was observed in the ocular fundus, corresponding to the area where the hyposphagma was located. DISCUSSION: Anaesthetic injection during palpebral repair may be complicated by inadvertent penetration of the eyeball. Intravitreal mepivacaine and adrenaline could cause macular and retinal lesions.

Adverse events associated with a large dose of intravenous lipid emulsion for suspected local anesthetic toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) has gained favor as a rescue treatment for cardiovascular collapse due to intravenous local anesthetic overdose, however, goals of ILE therapy are still being defined. We describe a case of a girl given 66 mL/kg of 20% lipid emulsion (ILE) in the treatment of presumed mepivacaine toxicity. CASE REPORT: An 11-year-old girl weighing 55.6 kg developed pallor, rolling back of the eyes, and rhythmic muscle twitching after receiving a mandibular nerve block injection with a 1.8 mL ampule of 3% mepivacaine. With concern for persistent seizures she was given three 1 mL/kg boluses of ILE, followed by an infusion of 0.25 mL/kg/min. The total dose ultimately administered was 3670 mL (66 mL/kg) over 7 h. A serum triglyceride concentration, drawn 2 h after cessation of ILE infusion, was estimated to be 16,583 mg/dL (429 mmol/L) after several dilutions; her blood was grossly lipemic. Notable signs included hypersomnolence, tachypnea, and tachycardia. Other complications included apparent metabolic acidosis (serum bicarbonate of 5 mmol/L) with hyperlactatemia (lactate 7.0 mmol/L), difficulty with serum laboratory interpretation, and a non-contrast brain magnetic resonance imaging showing high signal in the dural venous sinuses. The lipemia cleared over three days and the patient recovered uneventfully. Case discussion: This case demonstrates a unique neurologic and metabolic toxicity associated with ILE given as an antidote in a high total dose, and highlights the need for cautious antidotal application of lipid emulsion infusions. Until more data is available, clinicians are advised to take great care if considering a dose in excess of 12.5 mL/kg/day, the maximum daily dosage recommended by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for nutritional supplementation. Careful monitoring of total doses administered across institutions and hospital wards during transfers is paramount to avoid inadvertent overdose of antidotes.

Local Anesthetic-Induced Myotoxicity After Continuous Adductor Canal Block.

OBJECTIVE: Local anesthetic-induced myotoxicity occurs consistently in animal models, yet is reported rarely in humans. Herein, we describe 3 sentinel cases of local anesthetic myotoxicity after continuous adductor canal block (ACB). CASE REPORT: Three patients underwent total knee arthroplasty that was managed with subarachnoid block plus ACB induced with 1.5% lidocaine or 1.5% mepivacaine bolus followed by 0.2% ropivacaine at 8 mL/h. Although initial postoperative recovery was normal, each patient on either postoperative day 1 or 2 developed progressive, profound weakness of the quadriceps muscles. Clinical course, imaging, and neurophysiologic studies were consistent with myositis. The patients experienced partial to full functional recovery over the ensuing weeks to months. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically apparent local anesthetic-induced myotoxicity has been documented rarely in humans undergoing non-ophthalmic surgery. We report 3 sentinel cases associated with continuous ACB.